Accessing BCO-DMO data
Brought to you by BCO-DMO
|
|
BCO-DMO ERDDAP
Accessing BCO-DMO data |
log in
Brought to you by BCO-DMO |
| griddap | Subset | tabledap | Make A Graph | wms | files | Accessible | Title | Summary | FGDC | ISO 19115 | Info | Background Info | RSS | Institution | Dataset ID | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_806471 | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_806471.graph | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/files/bcodmo_dataset_806471/ | public | [234Th Flux] - 234Th flux in epipelagic waters at Station ALOHA and the Equatorial Pacific from R/V Kilo Moana cruises KM1407, KM1418, & KM1515 during 2014-2015 (Evaluating the relative importance of suspended and sinking particles to the meso and bathypelagic food web in the central North Pacific) | 234Th flux in epipelagic waters at Station ALOHA and the Equatorial Pacific from R/V Kilo Moana cruises KM1407, KM1418, & KM1515 during 2014-2015.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nCruise (unitless)\nDate_initial (unitless)\nDate_final (unitless)\nSite (unitless)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\nSeason (unitless)\ndepth (m)\nTh_flux (dpm m-2 d-1)\nTh_flux_error (dpm m-2 d-1)\n | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/bcodmo_dataset_806471_fgdc.xml | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/bcodmo_dataset_806471_iso19115.xml | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/info/bcodmo_dataset_806471/index.htmlTable | https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/806471
| https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/rss/bcodmo_dataset_806471.rss | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=bcodmo_dataset_806471&showErrors=false&email= | BCO-DMO | bcodmo_dataset_806471 | |||
| https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_922789_v1 | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_922789_v1.graph | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/files/bcodmo_dataset_922789_v1/ | public | [Compound specific isotope data] - Compound specific isotope data of amino acids for abyssal macrofauna, megafauna, sediments, sediment traps, and in situ filtered particles at Station ALOHA off Hawaii and Station M off California from 2019 to 2020 (Collaborative Research: Assessing the relative importance of small vs large particles as sources of nutrition to abyssal communities) | This dataset includes compound specific isotope data of amino acids for abyssal macrofauna, megafauna, sediments, sediment traps, and in situ filtered particles from off California (Station M) and Hawaii (Station ALOHA) collected from 2019 to 2020. These data were collected as part of a food web project to evaluate the relative importance of small and large particle types to abyssal communities.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nSample (unitless)\nCruise (unitless)\nDate_initial (unitless)\nDate_final (unitless)\nSite (unitless)\nLatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\nType (unitless)\nSpecies (unitless)\nType_filter (unitless)\ndepth (m)\nd15N (‰, vs AIR)\nd13C (‰, vs VPDB)\nALA_N (‰, vs AIR)\nGLY_N (‰, vs AIR)\nTHR_N (‰, vs AIR)\nSER_N (‰, vs AIR)\nVAL_N (‰, vs AIR)\nLEU_N (‰, vs AIR)\nILE_N (‰, vs AIR)\nPRO_N (‰, vs AIR)\nASX_N (‰, vs AIR)\nGLX_N (‰, vs AIR)\n... (42 more variables)\n | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/info/bcodmo_dataset_922789_v1/index.htmlTable | https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/922789
| https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/rss/bcodmo_dataset_922789_v1.rss | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=bcodmo_dataset_922789_v1&showErrors=false&email= | BCO-DMO | bcodmo_dataset_922789_v1 | |||||
| log in | [Lottia field experiment 2023] - Lottia gigantea growth data from field experiments of experimentally manipulated competitor densities on the Northern and Central California coast from Feb to Dec 2023 (Evolutionary and ecological dynamics of a contemporary climate-driven range expansion) | We harnessed an ongoing poleward range shift of the giant owl limpet (Lottia gigantea) in California, USA to test whether the effects of competition vary between the range core and expanding edge. To assess the strength of competition across the range, we experimentally manipulated densities of L. gigantea, and a competing grazer (L. scabra), at five rocky intertidal sites and measured limpet growth over ~10 months as a metric of performance. \n\nAs predicted, field surveys confirmed that L. gigantea density was higher in the range core than the range edge. Contrary to theory, range-core limpets that evolved in these dense populations were more strongly impacted by intra- and interspecific competition than range-edge limpets when both were held under standardized experimental densities of competitors. Importantly, both forms of competition had similar effects across the range, even though interspecific competition is rarely integrated into range-expansion theory. Consistent with theory, growth rates were fastest at the expanding edge. \n\nHowever, growth in range-edge limpets did not decline under high intra- and interspecific densities, suggesting that rapid growth rate did not come at the cost of reduced competitive ability. Growth in the expanded range may be enhanced by greater food availability as cooler temperatures lower metabolic demand and ameliorate competition. Our findings suggest that predicting the dynamics of range expansions will require greater consideration of how diverse recipient communities and environmental heterogeneity mediate the strength of competition and performance across an expanding species' range.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nBlock (unitless)\nTreatment (unitless)\nTag (unitless)\nSite (unitless)\ndate_initial (unitless)\nLength_initial (mm)\nLength_final (mm)\n... (5 more variables)\n | BCO-DMO | bcodmo_dataset_1000489_v1 | ||||||||||||
| log in | [Owl limpet growth rates and density 2023-2024] - Owl limpet growth rates and density in Northern and Central California collected from eight intertidal sites from May 2023 to Nov 2024 (Evolutionary and ecological dynamics of a contemporary climate-driven range expansion) | As the climate warms, species distributions are shifting poleward, but we have a limited understanding of how organisms perform in their expanded range and the environmental drivers that modulate performance across latitude during range expansions. The abundant center hypothesis (ACH) predicts that abundance and performance decline towards the edge of a species' range and is the foundation for most predictive theory extended to the eco-evolutionary dynamics of range shifts. However, it is unclear how often these predictions are met during actual range shifts and under what contexts deviations are expected. \n\nHere, we use a poleward range expansion of an intertidal limpet (Lottia gigantea) to test predictions regarding patterns of performance and environmental drivers across the geographic range. We monitored the growth of individual L. gigantea across 8 sites spanning 650 km of the California coast to quantify variation in performance. To relate growth to environmental variation, we surveyed the community of competing grazers for each owl limpet. This table contains individual-level records of initial and final shell dimensions, relative growth rates, and co-occurring grazer species counts and densities (including Lottia scabra, L. digitalis, L. pelta, Nuttallina spp., and Tegula funebralis) within focal L. gigantea territories across the eight study sites spanning the range core and expanding poleward edge, sampled between May 2023 and November 2024.\n\nStepwise forward model selection showed that competing grazing species had little effect on growth. Overall growth did not fit an ACH pattern, as growth in expanded sites was as high, if not higher than growth in range core sites. In contrast to predictions derived from the ACH, we observed rapid growth near the poleward range edge.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nPlot (unitless)\nTerritory_Area (Square centimeters (cm^2))\nL_scabra (unitless)\nL_scabra_density (individual/cm^2)\nL_digitalis (unitless)\n... (20 more variables)\n | BCO-DMO | bcodmo_dataset_1000468_v1 | ||||||||||||
| log in | [Owl limpet growth rates and mussel cover 2021-2023] - Owl limpet growth rates and mussel cover in Northern and Central California collected from eight intertidal sites from Jun 2021 to May 2023 (Evolutionary and ecological dynamics of a contemporary climate-driven range expansion) | As the climate warms, species distributions are shifting poleward, but we have a limited understanding of how organisms perform in their expanded range and the environmental drivers that modulate performance across latitude during range expansions. The abundant center hypothesis (ACH) predicts that abundance and performance decline towards the edge of a species' range and is the foundation for most predictive theory extended to the eco-evolutionary dynamics of range shifts. However, it is unclear how often these predictions are met during actual range shifts and under what contexts deviations are expected. \n\nHere, we use a poleward range expansion of an intertidal limpet (Lottia gigantea) to test predictions regarding patterns of performance and environmental drivers across the geographic range. We monitored the growth of individual L. gigantea across eight sites spanning 650 km of the California coast to quantify variation in performance. In this dataset, to relate growth to environmental variation, we surveyed the density of conspecifics and coverage of space-holding species (mussels) in limpet microenvironments. Included for each tagged focal limpet: a plot identifier, limpet count, mussel cover, initial and final shell length and width, initial and final sampling dates and location, and relative growth rate.\n\nAbundance declined towards the poleward edge, but mussel cover varied as a mosaic. Stepwise forward model selection showed that growth declined weakly with increasing mussel cover and increased slightly with warmer body temperatures. Overall growth did not fit an ACH pattern, as growth in expanded sites was as high, if not higher than growth in range core sites. In contrast to predictions derived from the ACH, we observed rapid growth near the poleward range edge.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nPlot (unitless)\nLottia_count (unitless)\nMussel_cover (cm^2)\nLength_initial (mm)\nWidth_initial (mm)\nDate_initial (unitless)\n... (8 more variables)\n | BCO-DMO | bcodmo_dataset_1000475_v1 | ||||||||||||
| https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_806502 | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_806502.graph | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/files/bcodmo_dataset_806502/ | public | [Particles and Zooplankton AA-CSIA] - Particles and Zooplankton Amino Acid Compound Specific Isotope Analyses (AA-CSIA) and zooplankton biomass at Station ALOHA and the Equatorial Pacific from R/V Kilo Moana cruises KM1407, KM1418, & KM1515 from 2014-2015 (Evaluating the relative importance of suspended and sinking particles to the meso and bathypelagic food web in the central North Pacific) | Particles and Zooplankton Amino Acid Compound Specific Isotope Analyses (AA-CSIA) and zooplankton biomass at Station ALOHA and the Equatorial Pacific from R/V Kilo Moana cruises KM1407, KM1418, & KM1515 from 2014-2015.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nCruise (unitless)\nDate_initial (unitless)\nDate_final (unitless)\nSite (unitless)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\nSeason (unitless)\nDayNight (Day Night, unitless)\nType (unitless)\nSizeFraction_min (Size Fraction Min, micrometers (um))\nSizeFraction_max (Size Fraction Max, micrometers (um))\ndepth (m)\nDepthInterval_max (Depth, meters (m))\nDepthInterval_min (Depth, meters (m))\nd15NSrcAA (D15 NSrc AA, ‰, vs AIR)\nPropagation_error (‰, vs AIR)\nPOC (Particulate Organic Carbon, micrograms per liter (ug L-1))\nPC (ug L-1)\nBiomass (mg DW m-3)\n | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/bcodmo_dataset_806502_fgdc.xml | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/bcodmo_dataset_806502_iso19115.xml | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/info/bcodmo_dataset_806502/index.htmlTable | https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/806502
| https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/rss/bcodmo_dataset_806502.rss | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=bcodmo_dataset_806502&showErrors=false&email= | BCO-DMO | bcodmo_dataset_806502 |