BCO-DMO ERDDAP
Accessing BCO-DMO data
log in    
Brought to you by BCO-DMO    
 
 
griddap Subset tabledap Make A Graph wms files Accessible Title Summary FGDC ISO 19115 Info Background Info RSS Email Institution Dataset ID
https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_925751_v1 https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_925751_v1.graph https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/files/bcodmo_dataset_925751_v1/ public [Macroalgal biodiversity experiment: coral growth and tissue mortality data] - Coral (Pocillopora verrucosa) growth and tissue mortality from experimental field plots in Moʻorea, French Polynesia in 2021 (Positive Effects of Coral Biodiversity on Coral Performance: Patterns, Processes, and Dynamics) Hundreds of studies now document positive relationships between biodiversity and critical ecosystem processes, but as ecological communities worldwide shift towards new species configurations, less is known regarding how biodiversity of undesirable species will shape the functioning of ecosystems or foundation species. We manipulated macroalgal species richness in experimental field plots to test whether and how identity and diversity of competing macroalgae affected the growth, survival, and microbiome of a common coral in Moʻorea, French Polynesia. These data include coral (Pocillopora verrucosa) percent growth and tissue mortality among corals outplanted into 25 cm x 21 cm experimental plots in the back reef lagoon on the north coast of Moʻorea, French Polynesia (17°28′37″S 149°50′21″W). We varied the macroalgal community on the upper surface of each plot by outplanting monocultures holding similar masses of: (1) Sargassum pacificum, (2) Turbinaria ornata, or (3) Amansia rhodantha, as well as (4) polycultures containing all three species (12 plots per treatment; Figure 1 of Clements et al., 2024). There were also two additional treatments: (5) plots with plastic algal mimics to control for effects of shading or abrasion unrelated to the biotic properties of live seaweeds and 6) control plots where corals, but not living algae or physical mimics, were present (n = 12 plots/treatment).\n\nThis dataset includes coral (Pocillopora verrucosa) growth and tissue mortality at 9 weeks for plots with no algae (control), plastic algal mimics, monocultures of Amansia rhodantha, Turbinaria ornata, or Sargassum pacificum, and polycultures containing all three algal species.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nID (unitless)\nTreatment (unitless)\nPlot (unitless)\nColony (unitless)\nPosition (unitless)\nGrowth_percent (unitless)\nMortality_percent (unitless)\n https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/info/bcodmo_dataset_925751_v1/index.htmlTable https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/925751 (external link) https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/rss/bcodmo_dataset_925751_v1.rss https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=bcodmo_dataset_925751_v1&showErrors=false&email= BCO-DMO bcodmo_dataset_925751_v1
log in [Scallop Density Survey - Trap CPUE] - Data from minnow traps placed across landscape fragmentation per se treatments in June, July, and August 2019 in Back Sound, NC to accompany scallop density surveys (Collaborative Research: Habitat fragmentation effects on fish diversity at landscape scales: experimental tests of multiple mechanisms) This dataset contains data from minnow traps placed across landscape fragmentation per se treatments in June, July, and August 2019 to accompany scallop density surveys. These data were collected as part of the following study published in Yarnall et al. (2024):\n\nTo explore the independent influence of fragmentation per se (patchiness) on mobile juvenile bay scallop (Argopecten irradians) density, we constructed 16 artificial seagrass unit (ASU) landscapes, consisting of four replicates each of four treatments. Fragmentation per se treatments consisted of three levels of patchiness while maintaining consistent total ASU area. We also examined the effect of patch-scale position on scallop densities. \n\nTo examine the relationship of potential scallop predator community density on scallop density, we deployed four baited minnow traps to accompany each density survey. \n\nData were collected by Drs. F. Joel Fodrie and Amy H. Yarnall for the Estuarine Ecology Laboratory of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's Institute of Marine Sciences.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nSite_ID (unitless)\nLandscape (unitless)\nNum_patches (integer)\nFootprint (unitless)\nRep_letter (unitless)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\nMonth (unitless)\nDate_In (unitless)\nTime_In (unitless)\ntime (Iso_datetime_utc_in, seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\nDate_Out (unitless)\nTime_Out (unitless)\n... (10 more variables)\n BCO-DMO bcodmo_dataset_939592_v1
log in [Scallop Density Surveys] - Scallop density survey data across landscape fragmentation per se treatments in June, July, and August 2019 in Back Sound, NC (Collaborative Research: Habitat fragmentation effects on fish diversity at landscape scales: experimental tests of multiple mechanisms) This dataset contains metadata and data for scallop density surveys across landscape fragmentation per se treatments in June, July, and August 2019. These data were collected as part of the following study published in Yarnall et al. (2024):\n\nTo explore the independent influence of fragmentation per se (patchiness) on mobile juvenile bay scallop (Argopecten irradians) density, we constructed 16 artificial seagrass unit (ASU) landscapes, consisting of four replicates each of four treatments. Fragmentation per se treatments consisted of three levels of patchiness while maintaining consistent total ASU area. We also examined the effect of patch-scale position on scallop densities. \n\nFreely mobile juvenile scallops were placed at a consistent density (indiv. m-2) across landscapes for three density survey trials, one each during June, July, and August 2019. Observers snorkel surveyed each landscape at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h during each trail, and recorded the number of scallops per ASU.\n\nData were collected by Drs. F. Joel Fodrie and Amy H. Yarnall for the Estuarine Ecology Laboratory of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's Institute of Marine Sciences.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nSite_ID (unitless)\nLandscape (unitless)\nNum_patches (count)\nFootprint (unitless)\nRep_letter (unitless)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\nDate_check (unitless)\nMonth (unitless)\nCheck_num (unitless)\nTime_check (unitless)\n... (14 more variables)\n BCO-DMO bcodmo_dataset_939617_v1
https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_812918 https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_812918.graph https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/files/bcodmo_dataset_812918/ public [Srednick et al. 2020 - L&O Methods - Flow] - Flume flow data from in-situ flume experiments to manipulate pCO2 on shallow tropical coral reef communities at UCB Gump Research Station Moorea, French Polynesia in May of 2018 (Moorea Coral Reef Long-Term Ecological Research site) Flume flow data from in-situ flume experiments to manipulate pCO2 on shallow tropical coral reef communities at UCB Gump Research Station Moorea, French Polynesia in May of 2018.  These data are for a proof of trial experiment for the Shallow COral REef Free Ocean Carbon Enrichment (SCORE FOCE), outlined in Srednick et al. (2020).\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nPOSITION (unitless)\nF1_Velocity_AVG (cm/s)\nF1_Velocity_SD (cm/s)\nF2_Velocity_AVG (cm/s)\nF2_Velocity_SD (cm/s)\n https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/info/bcodmo_dataset_812918/index.htmlTable https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/812918 (external link) https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/rss/bcodmo_dataset_812918.rss https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=bcodmo_dataset_812918&showErrors=false&email= BCO-DMO bcodmo_dataset_812918

 
ERDDAP, Version 2.22
Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Contact