![]() |
BCO-DMO ERDDAP
Accessing BCO-DMO data |
log in
Brought to you by BCO-DMO |
griddap | Subset | tabledap | Make A Graph | wms | files | Accessible | Title | Summary | FGDC | ISO 19115 | Info | Background Info | RSS | Institution | Dataset ID | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_883999_v1 | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_883999_v1.graph | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/files/bcodmo_dataset_883999_v1/ | public | [Dose response evaluation of oyster shell strengthening in response to homarine and trigonelline] - Juvenile oyster shell strength measurements from a dose response assay of chemical cues homarine and trigonelline conducted at Dauphin Island Sea Lab, Dauphin Island, AL in June - August 2021 (Collaborative Research: Keystone chemicals: Identifying general and universal molecules of fear) | These data include measurements of juvenile oyster shell strength from a dose response experiment conducted at Dauphin Island Sea Lab, Dauphin Island, AL in June - August of 2021.\nStudy description:\n\nHomarine and trigonelline are two blue crab urine metabolites that cause juvenile oysters to strengthen their shells are a defensive response. We evaluated the dose dependency of this response with a dose-response experiment where homarine and trigonelline concentrations (of each individual chemical and a combination of the two) spanned 5 log half-steps. Juvenile oysters were exposed to chemicals for 8 weeks and their shell strength (N) was measured and standardized to the size of the animals (mm) as a proxy for understanding this defense.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nID (unitless)\nBlock (unitless)\nTreatment (unitless)\nReplicate (unitless)\nPair (unitless)\nTile (unitless)\nIndividual (unitless)\nsize (millimeters (mm))\ncrushing_force (newtons (N))\nstand_crushing_force (newtons per millimeter (N/mm))\n | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/info/bcodmo_dataset_883999_v1/index.htmlTable | https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/883999![]() | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/rss/bcodmo_dataset_883999_v1.rss | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=bcodmo_dataset_883999_v1&showErrors=false&email= | BCO-DMO | bcodmo_dataset_883999_v1 | |||||
https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_918546_v1 | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_918546_v1.graph | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/files/bcodmo_dataset_918546_v1/ | public | [Effect of phenotypic variation on dogwhelk morphology during eco-evolutionary field experiment] - Effect of phenotypic variation on dogwhelk morphology during an eco-evolutionary field experiment (Coastal mosaics of local adaptation and the eco-evolutionary dynamics of a marine predator-prey interaction) | Although there is a growing body of work indicating that ecological and evolutionary processes can have reciprocal feedbacks on one another, few studies have tested these feedbacks in natural field settings at the community level. We tested the ecological consequences of selection on intra-population variation in dogwhelk drilling. We reared juvenile dogwhelks (Nucella canaliculata) on four early-life diet treatments (thin-shelled Mytilus trossulus, two treatments of M. californianus from two populations known to differ in adult shell thickness, and acorn barnacles) and then outplanted the dogwhelks to field cages to quantify the community effects of variation in drilling phenotype on mussel bed succession over a year. Changes in Nucella canaliculata morphology (change in length) were determined over the course of the experiment.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nBlock (unitless)\nPlot_Number (unitless)\nPlot_Tidal_Height (meters (m))\nFamily (unitless)\nSite_Latitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (Site_longitude, degrees_east)\nTreatment (unitless)\nFamily_x_Treatment (unitless)\nSnail_ID (unitless)\nSnail_Tag (unitless)\nSex (unitless)\nLength_initial (millimeters (mm))\nLength_final (millimeters (mm))\nLength_change (millimeters (mm))\nDead_vs_Replaced_vs_Never_found (unitless)\nDate_dead_or_replaced (unitless)\n | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/info/bcodmo_dataset_918546_v1/index.htmlTable | https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/918546![]() | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/rss/bcodmo_dataset_918546_v1.rss | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=bcodmo_dataset_918546_v1&showErrors=false&email= | BCO-DMO | bcodmo_dataset_918546_v1 | |||||
https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_918582_v1 | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_918582_v1.graph | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/files/bcodmo_dataset_918582_v1/ | public | [Effects of intra-population variation in dogwhelk drilling on the abundance and size of Mytilus californianus mussels] - Effects of intra-population variation in dogwhelk drilling on the abundance and size of Mytilus californianus mussels (Coastal mosaics of local adaptation and the eco-evolutionary dynamics of a marine predator-prey interaction) | Few eco-evolutionary studies have analyzed the impacts that evolutionary processes have on community dynamics in a natural field setting. We studied the effects of intra-population variation in predation in a marine dogwhelk (Nucella canaliculata) on mussel bed succession. We outplanted dogwhelks that were reared on four early-life diet treatments and showed evidence of differential mortality and variation in drilling capacity in the lab to experimental field cages and followed the trajectory of succession over the course of a year. At the end of the experiment, the organisms within the cages were collected and the mussels (Mytilus californianus) were measured. Mussels represent the end stage of succession, thus we studied whether variation in drilling traits would impact the size and structure of the mussel bed.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nBlock (unitless)\nPlot_Number (unitless)\nSite_Latitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (Site_longitude, degrees_east)\nDate (unitless)\nLength (millimeters (mm))\nLive_vs_Dead (unitless)\n | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/info/bcodmo_dataset_918582_v1/index.htmlTable | https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/918582![]() | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/rss/bcodmo_dataset_918582_v1.rss | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=bcodmo_dataset_918582_v1&showErrors=false&email= | BCO-DMO | bcodmo_dataset_918582_v1 | |||||
https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_664990 | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_664990.graph | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/files/bcodmo_dataset_664990/ | public | [Herbivore exclusion experiment] - Data from an herbivore exclusion experiment conducted on Abaco Island in the Bahamas from 2014-2016 (Mangrove Die-off project) (An interdisciplinary approach to elucidating the causes of widespread mangrove die-off) | Data from an herbivore exclusion experiment conducted on Abaco Island in the Bahamas from 2014-2016 (Mangrove Die-off project)\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nyear (unitless)\nmonth (unitless)\nsampling (unitless)\nlocation (unitless)\nblock (unitless)\ntreatment (unitless)\nleaves_num (count)\ndisease_leaves (count)\nchewed_leaves (count)\n | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/info/bcodmo_dataset_664990/index.htmlTable | https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/664990![]() | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/rss/bcodmo_dataset_664990.rss | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=bcodmo_dataset_664990&showErrors=false&email= | BCO-DMO | bcodmo_dataset_664990 | |||||
https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_777110.subset | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_777110 | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_777110.graph | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/files/bcodmo_dataset_777110/ | public | [LesionDistance_GrowthHealing] - Effect of distance between coral lesions on tissue regeneration and skeletal growth at two sites on the backreef on either side of Cook’s Bay in Moorea, French Polynesia from May, 2012 through July, 2012 (Spatial patterns of coral-vermetid interactions: short-term effects and long-term consequences) | Experimental corals were artificially damaged using a waterpik with lesion centroids separated by 1.2cm, 3.5cm, and 6cm (or no damage for the control), and buoyantly weighed. After 20 and 39 days, corals were re-weighed to determine buoyant mass and skeletal growth. Coral lesions were also photographed and images analyzed to assess the % of lesion with regenerated tissue.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nCoral (unitless)\nTreatment (unitless)\nBlock (unitless)\nInitial_Mass (grams (g))\nHalfway_Mass (grams (g))\nFinal_Mass (grams (g))\nGrowth_Midpoint (grams (g))\nGrowth_Final (grams (g))\nHealing_Mid (unitless)\nHealing_Final (unitless)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\n | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/bcodmo_dataset_777110_fgdc.xml | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/info/bcodmo_dataset_777110/index.htmlTable | https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/777110![]() | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/rss/bcodmo_dataset_777110.rss | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=bcodmo_dataset_777110&showErrors=false&email= | BCO-DMO | bcodmo_dataset_777110 | |||
https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_747525 | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_747525.graph | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/files/bcodmo_dataset_747525/ | public | [percent cover CPCE] - Percent cover of coral in pacific Panama using the coral point count method from 2016-2018 (Collaborative Research: Climate Change, Mesoscale Oceanography, and the Dynamics of Eastern Pacific Coral Reefs) | Percent cover of coral in pacific Panama using the coral point count method from 2016-2018.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nUIN (unitless)\nGulf (unitless)\nSite (unitless)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ntime2 (Time, unitless)\nBlock (unitless)\nGulfN (Gulf N, unitless)\nSiteN (Site N, unitless)\nTimeStep (Time Step, unitless)\nReplicate (unitless)\ncoralN (Coral N, count)\nnotcoralN (Notcoral N, count)\nTotalMinusTape (Total Minus Tape, count)\nCC (percent (%))\nMeanHealth (Mean Health, health score)\n | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/bcodmo_dataset_747525_fgdc.xml | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/info/bcodmo_dataset_747525/index.htmlTable | https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/747525![]() | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/rss/bcodmo_dataset_747525.rss | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=bcodmo_dataset_747525&showErrors=false&email= | BCO-DMO | bcodmo_dataset_747525 | ||||
https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_918518_v1 | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_918518_v1.graph | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/files/bcodmo_dataset_918518_v1/ | public | [Percent cover measure of mussel bed succession on rocky shores due to intra-population variation in dogwhelk drilling] - Percent cover measure of mussel bed succession on rocky shores due to intra-population variation in dogwhelk drilling (Coastal mosaics of local adaptation and the eco-evolutionary dynamics of a marine predator-prey interaction) | Despite growing interest of eco-evolutionary dynamics, there have been few experiments that test the importance of these feedbacks in natural ecosystems at the community level. A selection experiment on intra-population variation in dogwhelk (Nucella canaliculata) drilling was performed in the laboratory. Dogwhelks were given one of four early-life diet treatments (thin-shelled Mytilus trossulus mussels, two treatments of M. californianus from two populations known to differ in shell thickness, and acorn barnacles) for the first 3 months of life. Surviving adult dogwhelks were outplanted to field cages at Bodega Marine Reserve to test the ecological consequences of divergent phenotypes. Mussel bed succession was quantified by percent cover of sessile organisms in the plots over the course of approximately one year.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nBlock (unitless)\nPlot_Number (unitless)\nFamily (unitless)\nSite_Latitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (Site_longitude, degrees_east)\nTreatment (unitless)\nFamily_x_Treatment (unitless)\nDate (unitless)\nCheck (unitless)\nBare_Rock (percent (%))\nAcorn_Barnacles (percent (%))\nMussels (percent (%))\nGooseneck_Barnacles (percent (%))\nOther_Sessile_Animals (percent (%))\nCoralline_Algae (percent (%))\nAlgae_and_Surfgrass (percent (%))\n | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/info/bcodmo_dataset_918518_v1/index.htmlTable | https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/918518![]() | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/rss/bcodmo_dataset_918518_v1.rss | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=bcodmo_dataset_918518_v1&showErrors=false&email= | BCO-DMO | bcodmo_dataset_918518_v1 | |||||
https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_641692.subset | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_641692 | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_641692.graph | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/files/bcodmo_dataset_641692/ | public | [Rock Wall Experiment] - Rock wall manipulation experiment conducted in Bodega Bay, CA from 2010-2011 (Long-term and interactive effects of seaweed diversity and herbivory on intertidal community structure and functioning) | These data summarize results from a field experiment testing effects of\ngastropod grazer diversity and substrate heterogeneity generated by barnacles\non intertidal algal succession. The\\u00a0manipulation experiment was conducted\nin Bodega Bay, CA from 2010-2011.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nlocation (dimensionless)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\nsurvey (dimensionless)\ndate (unitless)\nmonth (mm (01 to 12))\nday (dd (01 to 31))\nyear (unitless)\nplot (dimensionless)\nblock (dimensionless)\nherb_trtmt (dimensionless)\nbarnacle_trtmt (dimensionless)\nbarn_trtmt (dimensionless)\narea (square centimeters (cm^2))\ntaxon (dimensionless)\nabundance (varies by taxon/group (see description))\n | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/bcodmo_dataset_641692_fgdc.xml | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/info/bcodmo_dataset_641692/index.htmlTable | https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/641692![]() | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/rss/bcodmo_dataset_641692.rss | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=bcodmo_dataset_641692&showErrors=false&email= | BCO-DMO | bcodmo_dataset_641692 | |||
https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_851437_v1 | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_851437_v1.graph | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/files/bcodmo_dataset_851437_v1/ | public | [Temperature Data] - Temperature data collected in the bottoms of intertidal rock tide pools at Bodega Marine Reserve intertidal zone, between October 2017 and August 2019 (Collaborative Research: Context-dependency of top-down vs. bottom-up effects of herbivores on marine primary producers) | Temperature data collected in the bottoms of intertidal rock tide pools at Bodega Marine Reserve intertidal zone, between October 2017 and August 2019.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\ntime (Datetimeutc, seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\nSite (unitless)\nPool (unitless)\nLatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\nTempC (degrees Celsius (°C))\nTidBitID (unitless)\nBlock (unitless)\nTrtGroup (unitless)\nHerbivoreTreat (unitless)\nTempTreat (unitless)\nNutrientTreat (unitless)\n | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/info/bcodmo_dataset_851437_v1/index.htmlTable | https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/851437![]() | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/rss/bcodmo_dataset_851437_v1.rss | https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=bcodmo_dataset_851437_v1&showErrors=false&email= | BCO-DMO | bcodmo_dataset_851437_v1 |