BCO-DMO ERDDAP
Accessing BCO-DMO data 		log in    
Brought to you by BCO-DMO    
 
 
griddap Subset tabledap Make A Graph wms files Accessible Title Summary FGDC ISO 19115 Info Background Info RSS Email Institution Dataset ID
log in [Benthic community composition] - Benthic community composition from a field experiment manipulating consumer pressure and nutrient availability on a coral reef in Moorea, French Polynesia from 2018 to 2022 (Collaborative Research: Tipping points in coral reefs and their associated microbiomes: interactive effects of herbivory, nutrient enrichment, and temperature) Here we experimentally test the relative importance of alterations to top-down and bottom-up processes in driving community development and variability after a simulated disturbance on a coral reef. We use a factorial experiment manipulating consumer pressure and nutrient enrichment for four years on a coral reef in Moorea, French Polynesia. Our experiment consisted of plots (~1.25 m2 each) that manipulated access by consumers via different size openings that allowed different size fishes access to the benthos, creating four levels of consumer pressure (Very Low, Low, Medium, High). These four levels of consumer pressure were crossed with manipulations of nutrient availability with either ambient or nutrient enriched conditions. At the start of the experiment, we removed all live corals and fleshy macroalgae from the plots to mimic the effects of a severe cyclone. We quantified the abundance of benthic organisms (e.g., corals, macroalgae, etc.) for four years to assess how experimental treatments affected community development. At three time points each year (April, July/August, November - except for two time points missed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, April 2020 and November 2020), we quantified benthic cover in each exclosure via point contacts on orthorectified photomosaics. Using Olympus TG cameras, we took ~64 individual photographs of each exclosure and then generated photomosaics by stitching photographs together using Agisoft Metashape software (Agisoft Metashape Professional Version 17.0). These photomosaics generate high-resolution imagery that allows identification of benthic space holders to the lowest taxonomic level possible (genus for most corals and macroalgae). It was not possible to reliably distinguish among filamentous turf algae, bare space, and very small encrusting algae (including small CCAs and other encrusting algae) from photographs, therefore these taxa were categorized as one group. We used these data to generate percent cover estimates for each exclosure at each timepoint. Percent cover of benthic space holders was estimated via 225 random points per m2 exclosure using CoralNet software.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nTime_point (unitless)\nTimepoint (unitless)\nunitless (Date)\nBlock_Plot (unitless)\nBlock (unitless)\n... (51 more variables)\n BCO-DMO bcodmo_dataset_1000908_v1
log in [Coral bleaching and mortality] - Coral bleaching and mortality data from a field experiment manipulating herbivore pressure and nutrient availability on a coral reef in Moorea, French Polynesia from 2018 to 2022 (Collaborative Research: Tipping points in coral reefs and their associated microbiomes: interactive effects of herbivory, nutrient enrichment, and temperature) Here, we used a large-scale field experiment on the forereef of Moorea, French Polynesia to directly test how different levels of simulated fishing impacted the dynamics of coral reef communities before, during, and after a major MHW that caused significant coral bleaching and mortality. We used 16, ~1.25m2 exclosures to create four different levels of consumer pressure (Very Low, Low, Medium, and High) by altering the hole sizes in the exclosures to allow access to fishes based on body size. These treatments created a gradient of access for important herbivorous fishes (e.g., parrotfishes, surgeonfishes), as well as corallivorous fishes, and allowed us to examine how reductions in consumer pressure, as would happen with intensifying fishing, impact benthic dynamics. At the beginning of the experiment in 2018, coral cover across treatments was 57%, and we assessed the temporal dynamics of coral and macroalgae in response to altering consumer pressure. In 2019, Moorea experienced one of the most intense MHWs on record resulting in widespread coral mortality. Thus, we were able to directly test how varying consumer pressure impacted coral reef communities during the months prior to the MWH, during the MHW, and then for three years after the immediate impact of the MHW.\n \nUsing Olympus TG cameras, we took ~64 individual photographs of each exclosure which were then stitched together using Agisoft Metashape software. The creation of these photomosaics generates high-resolution imagery that allows identification of benthic space holders with high taxonomic resolution. The photomosaics allowed us to track the fates of individual corals across our time series. At the first time point in our time series (Aug 2018), we gave each individual Pocillopora and Acropora a unique identifying number. During the peak of coral bleaching, in May 2019, we took additional top-down photographs of each exclosure, allowing us to quantify whether each individual coral had bleached and, if so, what proportion of the colony surface area (to the nearest 5%) was bleached or dead. Because corals undergo natural, seasonal variation in Symbiodiniaceae density that can affect their coloration, we defined bleached tissue only as tissue that had lost all pigmentation. Bleaching severity was bimodal, with most corals either 0 or 100 percent bleached. However, approximately 36% of corals with some bleaching had less than 100% of their tissue bleached.  For analyses, we defined 50% bleached as a severe bleaching threshold. Using our photomosaics, we then tracked the annual survival or mortality of each coral in August of each year (Aug 2019, Aug 2020, Aug 2021, Aug 2022).  Corals frequently had partial mortality, with colonies sometimes having small amounts of remnant tissue which would remain for many months. Therefore, we used a threshold of the loss of 90% of live tissue to define a coral as being dead since we never observed recovery from this level of tissue loss.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nBlock (unitless)\n... (30 more variables)\n BCO-DMO bcodmo_dataset_1000902_v1
log in [Damselfish Energetics] - Damselfish energetics from multiple shallow reef sites in the Caribbean between June 2016-2019 (Beyond Cleaning and Symbiosis: Ecology of 'Ticks of the Sea' on Coral Reefs) Food webs are a complex array of trophic interactions. With a heavy emphasis on \"classic\" predator-prey interactions, most studies of trophic dynamics completely omitted parasitic interactions. However, recent work has shown that parasites contribute significantly to many aspects of trophic structure. In the current study, I have estimated the biomass transfer by parasites and predators from members of the genus Stegastes from multiple sites in the Caribbean. These results show that most of the parasite-driven biomass transfer comes from ectoparasitic gnathiid isopods. Moreover, I have found that predation rates are high for juveniles and decrease as they become adults, while the opposite is true for parasitism. Despite this, more biomass is being transferred from adults than younger stages via both predation and parasitism. I also show that in coral reef ecosystems, parasitism can transfer more biomass than predation for adult Stegastes. These results highlight the contribution of parasites to energy flow in coral reef environments and suggest that they must be considered in future food web studies.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nid (unitless)\nsite (unitless)\nisland (unitless)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\nstage (unitless)\nspecies (unitless)\nseg (unitless)\nblock (unitless)\nstarttime (unitless)\nendtime (unitless)\np1 (unitless)\np2 (unitless)\np3 (unitless)\nptotal (unitless)\nlength (centimeters (cm))\n... (9 more variables)\n BCO-DMO bcodmo_dataset_887892_v1
https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_883999_v1 https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_883999_v1.graph https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/files/bcodmo_dataset_883999_v1/ public [Dose response evaluation of oyster shell strengthening in response to homarine and trigonelline] - Juvenile oyster shell strength measurements from a dose response assay of chemical cues homarine and trigonelline conducted at Dauphin Island Sea Lab, Dauphin Island, AL in June - August 2021 (Collaborative Research: Keystone chemicals: Identifying general and universal molecules of fear) These data include measurements of juvenile oyster shell strength from a dose response experiment conducted at Dauphin Island Sea Lab, Dauphin Island, AL in June - August of 2021.\nStudy description:\n\nHomarine and trigonelline are two blue crab urine metabolites that cause juvenile oysters to strengthen their shells are a defensive response. We evaluated the dose dependency of this response with a dose-response experiment where homarine and trigonelline concentrations (of each individual chemical and a combination of the two) spanned 5 log half-steps. Juvenile oysters were exposed to chemicals for 8 weeks and their shell strength (N) was measured and standardized to the size of the animals (mm) as a proxy for understanding this defense.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nID (unitless)\nBlock (unitless)\nTreatment (unitless)\nReplicate (unitless)\nPair (unitless)\nTile (unitless)\nIndividual (unitless)\nsize (millimeters (mm))\ncrushing_force (newtons (N))\nstand_crushing_force (newtons per millimeter (N/mm))\n https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/info/bcodmo_dataset_883999_v1/index.htmlTable https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/883999 (external link) https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/rss/bcodmo_dataset_883999_v1.rss https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=bcodmo_dataset_883999_v1&showErrors=false&email= BCO-DMO bcodmo_dataset_883999_v1
https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_918546_v1 https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_918546_v1.graph https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/files/bcodmo_dataset_918546_v1/ public [Effect of phenotypic variation on dogwhelk morphology during eco-evolutionary field experiment] - Effect of phenotypic variation on dogwhelk morphology during an eco-evolutionary field experiment (Coastal mosaics of local adaptation and the eco-evolutionary dynamics of a marine predator-prey interaction) Although there is a growing body of work indicating that ecological and evolutionary processes can have reciprocal feedbacks on one another, few studies have tested these feedbacks in natural field settings at the community level. We tested the ecological consequences of selection on intra-population variation in dogwhelk drilling. We reared juvenile dogwhelks (Nucella canaliculata) on four early-life diet treatments (thin-shelled Mytilus trossulus, two treatments of M. californianus from two populations known to differ in adult shell thickness, and acorn barnacles) and then outplanted the dogwhelks to field cages to quantify the community effects of variation in drilling phenotype on mussel bed succession over a year. Changes in Nucella canaliculata morphology (change in length) were determined over the course of the experiment.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nBlock (unitless)\nPlot_Number (unitless)\nPlot_Tidal_Height (meters (m))\nFamily (unitless)\nSite_Latitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (Site_longitude, degrees_east)\nTreatment (unitless)\nFamily_x_Treatment (unitless)\nSnail_ID (unitless)\nSnail_Tag (unitless)\nSex (unitless)\nLength_initial (millimeters (mm))\nLength_final (millimeters (mm))\nLength_change (millimeters (mm))\nDead_vs_Replaced_vs_Never_found (unitless)\nDate_dead_or_replaced (unitless)\n https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/info/bcodmo_dataset_918546_v1/index.htmlTable https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/918546 (external link) https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/rss/bcodmo_dataset_918546_v1.rss https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=bcodmo_dataset_918546_v1&showErrors=false&email= BCO-DMO bcodmo_dataset_918546_v1
https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_918582_v1 https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_918582_v1.graph https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/files/bcodmo_dataset_918582_v1/ public [Effects of intra-population variation in dogwhelk drilling on the abundance and size of Mytilus californianus mussels] - Effects of intra-population variation in dogwhelk drilling on the abundance and size of Mytilus californianus mussels (Coastal mosaics of local adaptation and the eco-evolutionary dynamics of a marine predator-prey interaction) Few eco-evolutionary studies have analyzed the impacts that evolutionary processes have on community dynamics in a natural field setting. We studied the effects of intra-population variation in predation in a marine dogwhelk (Nucella canaliculata) on mussel bed succession. We outplanted dogwhelks that were reared on four early-life diet treatments and showed evidence of differential mortality and variation in drilling capacity in the lab to experimental field cages and followed the trajectory of succession over the course of a year. At the end of the experiment, the organisms within the cages were collected and the mussels (Mytilus californianus) were measured. Mussels represent the end stage of succession, thus we studied whether variation in drilling traits would impact the size and structure of the mussel bed.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nBlock (unitless)\nPlot_Number (unitless)\nSite_Latitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (Site_longitude, degrees_east)\nDate (unitless)\nLength (millimeters (mm))\nLive_vs_Dead (unitless)\n https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/info/bcodmo_dataset_918582_v1/index.htmlTable https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/918582 (external link) https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/rss/bcodmo_dataset_918582_v1.rss https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=bcodmo_dataset_918582_v1&showErrors=false&email= BCO-DMO bcodmo_dataset_918582_v1
log in [Experiment 3: the effect of distance to the nearest neighbour on reproductive output and paternity] - The effect of distance to the nearest neighbour on reproductive output and paternity of Bugula neritina in the Gulf of Mexico, Florida from April to June 2021. (Consequences of kin structure in benthic marine systems) In the Gulf of Mexico, Florida, we performed a series of field experiments using an experimentally tractable species (the bryozoan Bugula neritina) to test the hypothesis that the density, spatial arrangement, and genetic relatedness of neighbours differentially affect survival, growth, reproduction, paternity, and sperm dispersal. We manipulated the density and relatedness of neighbours and found that increased density reduced survival but not growth rate, and that there was no effect of relatedness on survival, growth, or fecundity, in contrast to previous studies. We also manipulated the distances to the nearest neighbour and used genetic markers to assign paternity within known mother–offspring groups to estimate how proximity affects mating success. Distance to the nearest neighbour did not affect the number of settlers produced, the paternity share, or the degree of multiple paternity. Overall, larger than expected sperm dispersal led to high multiple paternity, regardless of the distance to the nearest neighbour.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\nColony (units)\nBlock (units)\nTreatment (units)\nPosition (units)\nDirection (units)\nX (units)\nY (units)\nTime_days (units)\nBifurcations (units)\nZooids (units)\nrgr40 (units)\nOffspring (units)\nSamples (units)\nSurvival (units)\n BCO-DMO bcodmo_dataset_969070_v1
https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_664990 https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_664990.graph https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/files/bcodmo_dataset_664990/ public [Herbivore exclusion experiment] - Data from an herbivore exclusion experiment conducted on Abaco Island in the Bahamas from 2014-2016 (Mangrove Die-off project) (An interdisciplinary approach to elucidating the causes of widespread mangrove die-off) Data from an herbivore exclusion experiment conducted on Abaco Island in the Bahamas from 2014-2016 (Mangrove Die-off project)\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nyear (unitless)\nmonth (unitless)\nsampling (unitless)\nlocation (unitless)\nblock (unitless)\ntreatment (unitless)\nleaves_num (count)\ndisease_leaves (count)\nchewed_leaves (count)\n https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/bcodmo_dataset_664990_iso19115.xml https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/info/bcodmo_dataset_664990/index.htmlTable https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/664990 (external link) https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/rss/bcodmo_dataset_664990.rss https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=bcodmo_dataset_664990&showErrors=false&email= BCO-DMO bcodmo_dataset_664990
log in [Individual genetic assignments from hatchery samples and restored reefs] - Oyster genetic assignment data from an experimental oyster reef restoration in Ninigret Pond, Rhode Island (USA) in 2017-2020 (CAREER: Linking genetic diversity, population density, and disease prevalence in seagrass and oyster ecosystems) This dataset contains individual-level genetic cluster assignments for 619 eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:140657) sampled as part of an experimental oyster reef restoration in Ninigret Pond, Rhode Island, USA. Oysters include 104 juvenile individuals from source hatchery-labeled samples collected prior to reef construction and 515 individuals sampled from 12 experimental restored reefs in fall 2018 and again in fall 2020. Juvenile oysters were sourced from four commercial hatcheries spanning a broad geographic range along the U.S. Atlantic coast (Maine, Massachusetts, New York, and Virginia). Each individual oyster was assigned to one of four genetic clusters identified using discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) and sparse non-negative matrix factorization (sNMF) applied to SNP genotype data. The dataset includes a primary genetic cluster assignment used in downstream analyses, as well as assignments generated from all combinations of the two analytical genetic assignment approaches and 12 SNP sets varying in filtering parameters (24 'assignment sets' in total). These additional assignments sets were included to assess both the consistency of genetic assignments as a whole and the robustness of downstream ecological inferences to certain upstream bioinformatic decisions (i.e., how we filtered the SNP data and generated individual genetic assignments).\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nind_id (unitless)\nsampling_group (unitless)\nyearcoll (unitless)\nreef (unitless)\nblock (unitless)\ngrower (unitless)\nhatcherysource_label (unitless)\ngrower_by_hatcherysource_label (unitless)\nlibrary (unitless)\nprimary_genetic_assignment (unitless)\ndapc_assigned_genetic_cluster_g90maf01_ldprunedrsq05 (unitless)\ndapc_assigned_genetic_cluster_g90maf01_g20f2020 (unitless)\n... (21 more variables)\n BCO-DMO bcodmo_dataset_1004242_v1
https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_777110.subset https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_777110 https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_777110.graph https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/files/bcodmo_dataset_777110/ public [LesionDistance_GrowthHealing] - Effect of distance between coral lesions on tissue regeneration and skeletal growth at two sites on the backreef on either side of Cook’s Bay in Moorea, French Polynesia from May, 2012 through July, 2012 (Spatial patterns of coral-vermetid interactions: short-term effects and long-term consequences) Experimental corals were artificially damaged using a waterpik with lesion centroids separated by 1.2cm, 3.5cm, and 6cm (or no damage for the control), and buoyantly weighed.  After 20 and 39 days, corals were re-weighed to determine buoyant mass and skeletal growth.  Coral lesions were also photographed and images analyzed to assess the % of lesion with regenerated tissue.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nCoral (unitless)\nTreatment (unitless)\nBlock (unitless)\nInitial_Mass (grams (g))\nHalfway_Mass (grams (g))\nFinal_Mass (grams (g))\nGrowth_Midpoint (grams (g))\nGrowth_Final (grams (g))\nHealing_Mid (unitless)\nHealing_Final (unitless)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\n https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/bcodmo_dataset_777110_fgdc.xml https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/bcodmo_dataset_777110_iso19115.xml https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/info/bcodmo_dataset_777110/index.htmlTable https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/777110 (external link) https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/rss/bcodmo_dataset_777110.rss https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=bcodmo_dataset_777110&showErrors=false&email= BCO-DMO bcodmo_dataset_777110
log in [Lottia field experiment 2023] - Lottia gigantea growth data from field experiments of experimentally manipulated competitor densities on the Northern and Central California coast from Feb to Dec 2023 (Evolutionary and ecological dynamics of a contemporary climate-driven range expansion) We harnessed an ongoing poleward range shift of the giant owl limpet (Lottia gigantea) in California, USA to test whether the effects of competition vary between the range core and expanding edge. To assess the strength of competition across the range, we experimentally manipulated densities of L. gigantea, and a competing grazer (L. scabra), at five rocky intertidal sites and measured limpet growth over ~10 months as a metric of performance. \n\nAs predicted, field surveys confirmed that L. gigantea density was higher in the range core than the range edge. Contrary to theory, range-core limpets that evolved in these dense populations were more strongly impacted by intra- and interspecific competition than range-edge limpets when both were held under standardized experimental densities of competitors. Importantly, both forms of competition had similar effects across the range, even though interspecific competition is rarely integrated into range-expansion theory. Consistent with theory, growth rates were fastest at the expanding edge. \n\nHowever, growth in range-edge limpets did not decline under high intra- and interspecific densities, suggesting that rapid growth rate did not come at the cost of reduced competitive ability. Growth in the expanded range may be enhanced by greater food availability as cooler temperatures lower metabolic demand and ameliorate competition. Our findings suggest that predicting the dynamics of range expansions will require greater consideration of how diverse recipient communities and environmental heterogeneity mediate the strength of competition and performance across an expanding species' range.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nBlock (unitless)\nTreatment (unitless)\nTag (unitless)\nSite (unitless)\ndate_initial (unitless)\nLength_initial (mm)\nLength_final (mm)\n... (5 more variables)\n BCO-DMO bcodmo_dataset_1000489_v1
log in [Morphometric, condition, and parasite trait data for oysters on restored reefs] - Oyster morphometric, condition, and parasite infection data from an experimental oyster reef restoration in Ninigret Pond, Rhode Island (USA) in 2018-2020 (CAREER: Linking genetic diversity, population density, and disease prevalence in seagrass and oyster ecosystems) This dataset contains individual-level morphometric, condition, and parasite infection measurements for eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:140657) sampled from 12 experimental restored reefs in Ninigret Pond, Rhode Island, USA, as part of a multi-year oyster reef restoration experiment using oysters sourced from four commercial hatcheries along the U.S. Atlantic coast. Morphometric and condition measurements, including shell height (mm), shell length (mm), dry tissue mass (g), dry shell mass (g), and condition index (dry tissue mass multiplied by 100 divided by dry shell mass), are provided for 515 individuals sampled in fall 2018 and fall 2020. Parasite infection data are provided for fall 2018 individuals only, and include presence/absence of infection by four oyster parasites: the macroparasites mud blister worm (Polydora sp.) and boring sponge (Cliona spp.), and the microparasites Haplosporidium costale and Perkinsus marinus. Infection intensity measurements are provided for the two most prevalent parasites, P. marinus and mud blister worm. The primary genetic cluster assignment for each individual is also provided; these assignments correspond to one of four genetic clusters identified with SNP genotype data, which broadly correspond to the four commercial hatchery sources (Maine, Massachusetts, New York, and Virginia) as described in the related genetic assignments dataset.\n\nThis dataset also contains supplemental data on reef-level prevalence of infection by the four oyster parasites summarized by oyster genetic cluster for the 12 experimental restored reefs. For each parasite, the reef-level dataset includes the total number of individuals sampled, the number infected, and the proportion infected, reported separately for oysters assigned to each genetic cluster on the 12 focal restored reefs.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nyearcoll (unitless)\nind_id (unitless)\nreef (unitless)\nblock (unitless)\nprimary_genetic_assignment (unitless)\nlibrary (unitless)\n... (13 more variables)\n BCO-DMO bcodmo_dataset_1004478_v1
log in [Pairwise individual genetic relatedness of oysters on restored reefs] - Genetic relatedness estimates calculated from SNP genotype data of oysters from an experimental oyster reef restoration in Ninigret Pond, Rhode Island (USA) in 2018-2020 (CAREER: Linking genetic diversity, population density, and disease prevalence in seagrass and oyster ecosystems) This dataset contains pairwise individual relatedness estimates for eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:140657) sampled from 12 experimental restored reefs in Ninigret Pond, Rhode Island, USA in fall 2018 and fall 2020, as part of a multi-year oyster reef restoration experiment using oysters sourced from four commercial hatcheries along the U.S. Atlantic coast. Pairwise relatedness was estimated for every unique pair of individuals within the same reef and assigned genetic cluster using the Wang estimator applied to the SNP genotype data. Genetic clusters broadly correspond to the four commercial hatchery sources (Maine, Massachusetts, New York, and Virginia) as described in the related genetic assignments dataset. These data enable assessment of fine-scale relatedness patterns within the assigned genetic clusters on individual reefs across the two sampling time points\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nyearcoll (unitless)\nblock (unitless)\nreef (unitless)\nprimary_genetic_assignment (unitless)\ngeneticcluster_year_reef (unitless)\nind_id_1 (unitless)\nind_id_2 (unitless)\nwang_relatedness (unitless)\n BCO-DMO bcodmo_dataset_1003777_v1
https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_747525 https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_747525.graph https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/files/bcodmo_dataset_747525/ public [percent cover CPCE] - Percent cover of coral in pacific Panama using the coral point count method from 2016-2018 (Collaborative Research: Climate Change, Mesoscale Oceanography, and the Dynamics of Eastern Pacific Coral Reefs) Percent cover of coral in pacific Panama using the coral point count method from 2016-2018.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nUIN (unitless)\nGulf (unitless)\nSite (unitless)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\ntime2 (Time, unitless)\nBlock (unitless)\nGulfN (Gulf N, unitless)\nSiteN (Site N, unitless)\nTimeStep (Time Step, unitless)\nReplicate (unitless)\ncoralN (Coral N, count)\nnotcoralN (Notcoral N, count)\nTotalMinusTape (Total Minus Tape, count)\nCC (percent (%))\nMeanHealth (Mean Health, health score)\n https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/bcodmo_dataset_747525_fgdc.xml https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/bcodmo_dataset_747525_iso19115.xml https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/info/bcodmo_dataset_747525/index.htmlTable https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/747525 (external link) https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/rss/bcodmo_dataset_747525.rss https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=bcodmo_dataset_747525&showErrors=false&email= BCO-DMO bcodmo_dataset_747525
https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_918518_v1 https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_918518_v1.graph https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/files/bcodmo_dataset_918518_v1/ public [Percent cover measure of mussel bed succession on rocky shores due to intra-population variation in dogwhelk drilling] - Percent cover measure of mussel bed succession on rocky shores due to intra-population variation in dogwhelk drilling (Coastal mosaics of local adaptation and the eco-evolutionary dynamics of a marine predator-prey interaction) Despite growing interest of eco-evolutionary dynamics, there have been few experiments that test the importance of these feedbacks in natural ecosystems at the community level. A selection experiment on intra-population variation in dogwhelk (Nucella canaliculata) drilling was performed in the laboratory. Dogwhelks were given one of four early-life diet treatments (thin-shelled Mytilus trossulus mussels, two treatments of M. californianus from two populations known to differ in shell thickness, and acorn barnacles) for the first 3 months of life. Surviving adult dogwhelks were outplanted to field cages at Bodega Marine Reserve to test the ecological consequences of divergent phenotypes. Mussel bed succession was quantified by percent cover of sessile organisms in the plots over the course of approximately one year.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nBlock (unitless)\nPlot_Number (unitless)\nFamily (unitless)\nSite_Latitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (Site_longitude, degrees_east)\nTreatment (unitless)\nFamily_x_Treatment (unitless)\nDate (unitless)\nCheck (unitless)\nBare_Rock (percent (%))\nAcorn_Barnacles (percent (%))\nMussels (percent (%))\nGooseneck_Barnacles (percent (%))\nOther_Sessile_Animals (percent (%))\nCoralline_Algae (percent (%))\nAlgae_and_Surfgrass (percent (%))\n https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/info/bcodmo_dataset_918518_v1/index.htmlTable https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/918518 (external link) https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/rss/bcodmo_dataset_918518_v1.rss https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=bcodmo_dataset_918518_v1&showErrors=false&email= BCO-DMO bcodmo_dataset_918518_v1
log in [Reef-level genetic diversity of assigned oyster genetic clusters] - Genetic diversity metrics for oyster genetic clusters from an experimental oyster reef restoration in Ninigret Pond, Rhode Island (USA) in 2018-2020 (CAREER: Linking genetic diversity, population density, and disease prevalence in seagrass and oyster ecosystems) This dataset contains genetic cluster-level estimates of genetic diversity for eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:140657) sampled from each of the 12 experimental restored reefs in Ninigret Pond, Rhode Island, USA in fall 2018 and fall 2020, as part of a multi-year oyster reef restoration experiment using oysters sourced from four commercial hatcheries along the U.S. Atlantic coast. Genetic diversity metrics - observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygosity (He), allelic richness (Ar), and inbreeding coefficient (FIS) - were estimated for each genetic cluster represented on each reef at the two sampling time points using SNP genotype data (4679 SNPs). Bootstrapped confidence intervals for FIS are also provided. Genetic clusters broadly correspond to the four commercial hatchery sources (Maine, Massachusetts, New York, and Virginia) as described in the related genetic assignments dataset.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nyearcoll (unitless)\nblock (unitless)\nreef (unitless)\nprimary_genetic_assignment (unitless)\nn_inds (count)\nHo (unitless (proportion))\nHe (unitless (proportion))\nAr (alleles per locus (standardized))\nFIS (unitless)\nFIS_ll (unitless)\nFIS_hl (unitless)\n BCO-DMO bcodmo_dataset_1004745_v1
https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_641692.subset https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_641692 https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_641692.graph https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/files/bcodmo_dataset_641692/ public [Rock Wall Experiment] - Rock wall manipulation experiment conducted in Bodega Bay, CA from 2010-2011 (Long-term and interactive effects of seaweed diversity and herbivory on intertidal community structure and functioning) These data summarize results from a field experiment testing effects of\ngastropod grazer diversity and substrate heterogeneity generated by barnacles\non intertidal algal succession. The\\u00a0manipulation experiment was conducted\nin Bodega Bay, CA from 2010-2011.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\nlocation (dimensionless)\nlatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\nsurvey (dimensionless)\ndate (unitless)\nmonth (mm (01 to 12))\nday (dd (01 to 31))\nyear (unitless)\nplot (dimensionless)\nblock (dimensionless)\nherb_trtmt (dimensionless)\nbarnacle_trtmt (dimensionless)\nbarn_trtmt (dimensionless)\narea (square centimeters (cm^2))\ntaxon (dimensionless)\nabundance (varies by taxon/group (see description))\n https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/metadata/fgdc/xml/bcodmo_dataset_641692_fgdc.xml https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/metadata/iso19115/xml/bcodmo_dataset_641692_iso19115.xml https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/info/bcodmo_dataset_641692/index.htmlTable https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/641692 (external link) https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/rss/bcodmo_dataset_641692.rss https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=bcodmo_dataset_641692&showErrors=false&email= BCO-DMO bcodmo_dataset_641692
https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_851437_v1 https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/tabledap/bcodmo_dataset_851437_v1.graph https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/files/bcodmo_dataset_851437_v1/ public [Temperature Data] - Temperature data collected in the bottoms of intertidal rock tide pools at Bodega Marine Reserve intertidal zone, between October 2017 and August 2019 (Collaborative Research: Context-dependency of top-down vs. bottom-up effects of herbivores on marine primary producers) Temperature data collected in the bottoms of intertidal rock tide pools at Bodega Marine Reserve intertidal zone, between October 2017 and August 2019.\n\ncdm_data_type = Other\nVARIABLES:\ntime (Datetimeutc, seconds since 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z)\nSite (unitless)\nPool (unitless)\nLatitude (degrees_north)\nlongitude (degrees_east)\nTempC (degrees Celsius (°C))\nTidBitID (unitless)\nBlock (unitless)\nTrtGroup (unitless)\nHerbivoreTreat (unitless)\nTempTreat (unitless)\nNutrientTreat (unitless)\n https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/info/bcodmo_dataset_851437_v1/index.htmlTable https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/851437 (external link) https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/rss/bcodmo_dataset_851437_v1.rss https://erddap.bco-dmo.org/erddap/subscriptions/add.html?datasetID=bcodmo_dataset_851437_v1&showErrors=false&email= BCO-DMO bcodmo_dataset_851437_v1

 
ERDDAP, Version 2.22
Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Contact