BCO-DMO ERDDAP
Accessing BCO-DMO data |
log in
Brought to you by BCO-DMO |
site | latitude | longitude | Notes | depth | Percent_Cover | Percent_Cover_SE | Abundance | Abundance_SE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
unitless | degrees_north | degrees_east | unitless | m | variable | percent (%) | per meter squared (m^-2) | per meter squared (m^-2) |
Jamaica_W-Z | 18.5 | -77.3333 | Percent cover is defined by these authors as Percent Cover of Available Substrate calculated from 0.2 m^2 photoquadrats | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
Jamaica_W-Z | 18.5 | -77.3333 | Percent cover is defined by these authors as Percent Cover of Available Substrate calculated from 0.2 m^2 photoquadrats | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||
Jamaica_W-Z | 18.5 | -77.3333 | Percent cover is defined by these authors as Percent Cover of Available Substrate calculated from 0.2 m^2 photoquadrats | 15.0 | 1.7 | 0.87 | ||
Jamaica_W-Z | 18.5 | -77.3333 | Percent cover is defined by these authors as Percent Cover of Available Substrate calculated from 0.2 m^2 photoquadrats | 22.0 | 2.2 | 0.82 | ||
Jamaica_W-Z | 18.5 | -77.3333 | Percent cover is defined by these authors as Percent Cover of Available Substrate calculated from 0.2 m^2 photoquadrats | 30.0 | 6.2 | 3.47 | ||
Jamaica_W-Z | 18.5 | -77.3333 | Percent cover is defined by these authors as Percent Cover of Available Substrate calculated from 0.2 m^2 photoquadrats | 45.0 | 4.6 | 1.43 | ||
Jamaica_W-Z | 18.5 | -77.3333 | Percent cover is defined by these authors as Percent Cover of Available Substrate calculated from 0.2 m^2 photoquadrats | 60.0 | 13.9 | 3.06 | ||
Jamaica_W-Z | 18.5 | -77.3333 | Percent cover is defined by these authors as Percent Cover of Available Substrate calculated from 0.2 m^2 photoquadrats | 75.0 | 17.0 | 2.35 | ||
Jamaica_W-Z | 18.5 | -77.3333 | Percent cover is defined by these authors as Percent Cover of Available Substrate calculated from 0.2 m^2 photoquadrats | 90.0 | 27.5 | 2.81 | ||
Jamaica_W-Z | 18.5 | -77.3333 | Percent cover is defined by these authors as Percent Cover of Available Substrate calculated from 0.2 m^2 photoquadrats | 120.0 | 20.0 | 3.57 | ||
Jamaica_M | 18.5 | -77.3333 | Percent cover is defined by these authors as Percent Cover of Available Substrate calculated from 0.2 m^2 photoquadrats | 45.0 | 8.4 | 2.35 | ||
Jamaica_M | 18.5 | -77.3333 | Percent cover is defined by these authors as Percent Cover of Available Substrate calculated from 0.2 m^2 photoquadrats | 53.0 | 15.6 | 2.55 | ||
Jamaica_M | 18.5 | -77.3333 | Percent cover is defined by these authors as Percent Cover of Available Substrate calculated from 0.2 m^2 photoquadrats | 60.0 | 20.1 | 3.06 | ||
Jamaica_M | 18.5 | -77.3333 | Percent cover is defined by these authors as Percent Cover of Available Substrate calculated from 0.2 m^2 photoquadrats | 68.0 | 16.7 | 3.93 | ||
Jamaica_M | 18.5 | -77.3333 | Percent cover is defined by these authors as Percent Cover of Available Substrate calculated from 0.2 m^2 photoquadrats | 75.0 | 16.7 | 2.3 | ||
Jamaica_M | 18.5 | -77.3333 | Percent cover is defined by these authors as Percent Cover of Available Substrate calculated from 0.2 m^2 photoquadrats | 90.0 | 27.5 | 5.15 | ||
Jamaica_M | 18.5 | -77.3333 | Percent cover is defined by these authors as Percent Cover of Available Substrate calculated from 0.2 m^2 photoquadrats | 106.0 | 21.4 | 3.01 | ||
Bahamas_BA | 23.7667 | -76.1 | Percent cover is defined by these authors as Percent Cover of Available Substrate calculated from 0.2 m^2 photoquadrats | 10.0 | 1.2 | 0.41 | ||
Bahamas_BA | 23.7667 | -76.1 | Percent cover is defined by these authors as Percent Cover of Available Substrate calculated from 0.2 m^2 photoquadrats | 20.0 | 1.5 | 0.77 | ||
Bahamas_BA | 23.7667 | -76.1 | Percent cover is defined by these authors as Percent Cover of Available Substrate calculated from 0.2 m^2 photoquadrats | 30.0 | 2.7 | 0.77 | ||
Bahamas_BA | 23.7667 | -76.1 | Percent cover is defined by these authors as Percent Cover of Available Substrate calculated from 0.2 m^2 photoquadrats | 50.0 | 6.3 | 1.58 | ||
Bahamas_BA | 23.7667 | -76.1 | Percent cover is defined by these authors as Percent Cover of Available Substrate calculated from 0.2 m^2 photoquadrats | 75.0 | 11.1 | 1.53 | ||
Bahamas_BA | 23.7667 | -76.1 | Percent cover is defined by these authors as Percent Cover of Available Substrate calculated from 0.2 m^2 photoquadrats | 100.0 | 6.3 | 1.33 | ||
Bahamas_BA | 23.7667 | -76.1 | Percent cover is defined by these authors as Percent Cover of Available Substrate calculated from 0.2 m^2 photoquadrats | 150.0 | 7.2 | 1.94 | ||
Bahamas_Bock_Wall | 23.7667 | -76.1 | Percent cover and abundance are per m^2 | 30.0 | 3.75 | 1.38 | 1.72 | 0.39 |
Bahamas_Bock_Wall | 23.7667 | -76.1 | Percent cover and abundance are per m^2 | 46.0 | 27.5 | 3.39 | 2.2 | 0.16 |
Bahamas_Bock_Wall | 23.7667 | -76.1 | Percent cover and abundance are per m^2 | 61.0 | 73.12 | 2.29 | 4.17 | 0.49 |
Bahamas_Bock_Wall | 23.7667 | -76.1 | Percent cover and abundance are per m^2 | 76.0 | 72.5 | 4.39 | 4.92 | 0.43 |
Bahamas_Bock_Wall | 23.7667 | -76.1 | Percent cover and abundance are per m^2 | 91.0 | 78.13 | 4.49 | 3.94 | 0.26 |
Little_Cayman_Rock_Bottom_Wall | 19.7005 | -80.0542 | Percent cover and abundance are per m^2 | 10.0 | 2.11 | 0.11 | ||
Little_Cayman_Rock_Bottom_Wall | 19.7005 | -80.0542 | Percent cover and abundance are per m^2 | 20.0 | 2.19 | 0.3 | ||
Little_Cayman_Rock_Bottom_Wall | 19.7005 | -80.0542 | Percent cover and abundance are per m^2 | 30.0 | 12.44 | 1.46 | 1.85 | 0.16 |
Little_Cayman_Rock_Bottom_Wall | 19.7005 | -80.0542 | Percent cover and abundance are per m^2 | 45.0 | 2.6 | 0.21 | ||
Little_Cayman_Rock_Bottom_Wall | 19.7005 | -80.0542 | Percent cover and abundance are per m^2 | 46.0 | 44.14 | 3.25 | ||
Little_Cayman_Rock_Bottom_Wall | 19.7005 | -80.0542 | Percent cover and abundance are per m^2 | 60.0 | 4.03 | 0.13 | ||
Little_Cayman_Rock_Bottom_Wall | 19.7005 | -80.0542 | Percent cover and abundance are per m^2 | 61.0 | 74.0 | 3.18 | ||
Little_Cayman_Rock_Bottom_Wall | 19.7005 | -80.0542 | Percent cover and abundance are per m^2 | 75.0 | 4.79 | 0.3 | ||
Little_Cayman_Rock_Bottom_Wall | 19.7005 | -80.0542 | Percent cover and abundance are per m^2 | 76.0 | 71.0 | 1.0 | ||
Little_Cayman_Rock_Bottom_Wall | 19.7005 | -80.0542 | Percent cover and abundance are per m^2 | 90.0 | 3.95 | 0.06 | ||
Little_Cayman_Rock_Bottom_Wall | 19.7005 | -80.0542 | Percent cover and abundance are per m^2 | 91.0 | 76.0 | 8.08 | ||
Palau_Turtle_Cove | 7.0843 | -134.2553 | Percent cover and abundance are per m^2 | 30.0 | 6.6 | 0.98 | 0.89 | 0.07 |
Palau_Turtle_Cove | 7.0843 | -134.2553 | Percent cover and abundance are per m^2 | 46.0 | 26.4 | 2.23 | 1.43 | 0.12 |
Palau_Turtle_Cove | 7.0843 | -134.2553 | Percent cover and abundance are per m^2 | 61.0 | 52.8 | 3.71 | 3.94 | 0.36 |
Palau_Turtle_Cove | 7.0843 | -134.2553 | Percent cover and abundance are per m^2 | 76.0 | 80.0 | 2.09 | 4.61 | 0.98 |
Palau_Turtle_Cove | 7.0843 | -134.2553 | Percent cover and abundance are per m^2 | 91.0 | 70.33 | 4.63 | 3.48 | 0.26 |
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 30.0 | 1.72 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 30.0 | 1.4 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 30.0 | 2.61 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 30.0 | 2.56 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 30.0 | 2.64 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 30.0 | 2.24 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 30.0 | 1.8 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 30.0 | 1.66 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 30.0 | 1.35 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 30.0 | 0.21 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 30.0 | 0.89 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 46.0 | 2.2 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 46.0 | 1.43 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 46.0 | 1.43 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 46.0 | 2.87 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 46.0 | 3.06 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 46.0 | 1.63 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 46.0 | 1.76 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 46.0 | 0.9 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 46.0 | 0.98 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 46.0 | 1.43 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 46.0 | 1.43 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 61.0 | 4.17 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 61.0 | 3.46 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 61.0 | 3.82 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 61.0 | 4.18 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 61.0 | 2.43 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 61.0 | 2.08 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 61.0 | 0.38 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 61.0 | 0.45 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 61.0 | 3.2 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 61.0 | 3.94 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 76.0 | 4.92 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 76.0 | 4.97 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 76.0 | 5.56 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 76.0 | 5.33 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 76.0 | 1.09 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 76.0 | 4.13 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 76.0 | 4.61 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 91.0 | 3.48 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 91.0 | 3.94 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 91.0 | 3.79 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 91.0 | 3.75 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 91.0 | 3.73 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 91.0 | 6.33 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 91.0 | 3.35 | |||||
Golbal_Density_Analysis | Abundances are per m^2 | 91.0 | 3.48 |